Tom Cruise, Jamie Foxx, Elton John And More: Celebrities Who Changed Their Names

Born in Greece with the very Greek name of Anastassakis, John decided to simplify his last name by shortening it to Aniston.Whoopi Goldberg is a name that stands out in a crowd. That name turned out to be a bit of a mouthful, so his agent asked him to change it. Originally born Demetria Gene Guynes,  Moore dropped the last two syllables from her first name and went by “Demi” instead. “It grew to the point where more people in my circle would know me by that name than by my real name.” So the moniker stuck.Born Eric Marlon Bishop, Jamie Foxx changed his first name to sound more gender-neutral. Goldberg revealed the origins of her stage name in an interview with the New York Times, “If you get a little gassy, you’ve got to let it go. Sometimes changing a name can be as easy as changing a shirt.Elton John once had a much longer name, Reginald Kenneth Dwight. It may surprise some superfans to know that Cruise’s birth name is actually Thomas Cruise Mapother IV. Goldberg’s birth name, however, was the much more common, nondescript Caryn Elaine Johnson. (Getty Images)In order to make it in Hollywood, stars like Elton John, Tom Cruise, and Jamie Foxx had to make a serious change in order to reach the spotlight. That doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue, however. “John Legend is a nickname that some friends started calling me, and it kind of grew into my stage name,” Legend said in a 2008 MTV interview. His last name was chosen in honor of the late great Redd Foxx.Jennifer Aniston wasn’t technically the one who changed her family name. John created his new name from two famous blues players: a singer named “Long” John Baldry and saxophonist Elton Dean. As the star of the Mission Impossible franchise, Tom Cruise is a household name around the world. His full legal name is John Roger Stephens. 2008.Solomon, Deborah. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Flipboard Share via Email Elton John Jamie Foxx Tom CruiseSourcesOchoa, John. “John Legend Reflects On His Early Days When Kanye West Was Opening For Him.” MTV, 21 Aug. As a stand-up comedian, he noticed that female stand-ups were often called to the stage first. “Making Nice.” The New York Times, 20 Aug. It was her father, Days Of Our Lives actor John Aniston who made the choice to switch things up. Moore’s current last name comes from her first marriage to singer Freddy Moore. They and other celebrities like them legally changed their names, some to stand out from others with similar names, and others to fit in a little more. 2006. So people used to say to me, ‘You’re like a whoopee cushion.’ And that’s where the name came from.” “Goldberg” is actually a family name, Goldberg’s mother’s maiden name to be specific.Demi Moore found that less was actually more when she shortened her name. Cruise chose his middle name as a replacement for his last name and a legend was born.Speaking of legends, John Legend, crooner extraordinaire, is actually just the singer’s nickname.

Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise Finding Way For Actor To See Daughter Suri Again?

And just last week, we debunked the tabloid’s cover story which wrongly and bizarrely contended Holmes told Suri that Cruise is not her “real dad.” That tale was also a complete fabrication. The more transparency and responsibility there is in a report, the more reliable it is. In fact, that’s the motivation for Gossip Cop looking back at the piece about Holmes and Cruise trying to find a way for him to see Suri again. It should also be mentioned how all these claims have come from the very same outlet that insisted on its cover that Holmes was having a “miracle baby” with Jamie Foxx. That never happened, Holmes’ spokesperson confirmed to Gossip Cop. Gossip Cop looked into the report back then and was assured it was untrue, and now a year later there should be no question the magazine’s tale was nothing more than a work of fiction. Katie Holmes Star Magazine Suri Cruise Tom Cruise

Sources

Leslie Sloane, spokesperson for Katie Holmes, 27 June 2018 (and subsequently). “Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes Working Out Deal For Him To Reunite With Suri?” Gossip Cop, 27 June 2018. Conversely, each and every one of our fact-checked articles had a rep on the record committing to their comments. Conversely, Holmes’ own rep told us the magazine’s narrative was simply made-up. “Katie Holmes Told Suri That Tom Cruise Is Not Her Real Dad?” Gossip Cop, 20 June 2019. Last year, Star maintained Holmes and Cruise were trying to find a way for Suri to reconnect with her dad. Suffice to say, time is not the friend of magazines that publish inaccurate articles. That was the premise of a tabloid’s story from 12 months ago today. For instance, in January the magazine falsely asserted Cruise and Suri had a reunion in Orlando right before New Year’s. Shuster, Andrew. To be sure, the publication has had a poor track record in the past with its reports about those stars, and it has not gotten noticeably better since its piece about Cruise and Holmes trying to work out a deal for him to have a reunion with Suri. Shuster, Andrew. “Katie Holmes NOT Having ‘Miracle Baby’ With Jamie Foxx, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 5 Sept. To back up its claim, the outlet said it was told by an unnamed source that Holmes was initially hesitant to allow her ex-husband to spend time with Suri, but after he agreed to not try to get their daughter to rejoin the Church of Scientology, the actress signed off on the father-daughter visit. 2018. Shuster, Andrew. 2019. Of course, 365 days have passed and there was no such meeting between Cruise and Suri. Shuster, Andrew. A little more than nine months have gone by, and clearly Holmes hasn’t given birth to another child. (Getty Images)
Are Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise trying to find a way for him to see daughter Suri after all these years? At Gossip Cop noted at the time, the tabloid’s article was predicated on an anonymous, unaccountable, and possibly manufactured source. “Tom Cruise Reunited With Daughter Suri In Orlando?” Gossip Cop, 9 Jan. On occasion we re-examine stories from a year ago to remind readers how they need to question tabloids tales that are hinged on the remarks of untraceable sources.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Went Public Because Tom Cruise Is Dating Elisabeth Moss?

2018. 2019. Weiss, Shari. “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes ‘Split’ Cover Is Late And Wrong.” Gossip Cop, 3 Jul. 15 May 2019. “Why Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Are Finally Coming Out of Hiding.” E! Shuster, Andrew. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Secretly Married In Paris?” Gossip Cop, 9 Jan. Grossbart, Sarah. News, 7 May 2019. Erica Gray, Spokesperson for Elisabeth Moss.
Cruise has never been spotted at the games. Last year, we called out the magazine for wrongly reporting Holmes and Foxx had split. “He’s too in love with Elisabeth to care anymore.”
As noted above, Cruise and Moss aren’t an item, so the tabloid’s entire storyline is baseless. The pair didn’t walk the red carpet together, but instead posed for a few photos once inside the venue. The actress and the actor aren’t hiding their relationship, but they’re not flaunting it either. Magazine Tom Cruise

Sources

Shuster, Andrew. It should be noted, however, that Holmes and Foxx didn’t exactly step out as a couple at the Met Gala. This has led to the tabloid concocting a story about how Cruise’s supposed new relationship inspired the two to come out as a couple. (Getty Images)
A tabloid claims the reason Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx went public at the Met Gala is because Tom Cruise is supposedly dating Elisabeth Moss. Nothing about the story is remotely true. “The word is that there may have been a lot of resentment from Tom in the past,” adds the alleged insider. As for OK!’s track record, Gossip Cop busted the tabloid in January for making up a story about Holmes and Foxx getting secretly married in Paris. “Katie and Jamie feel like they can be open with their love now that Tom has fallen for Elisabeth,” a supposed source tells the magazine. News, a much more reliable source for celebrity reporting than OK!, noted that Holmes and Foxx came out of hiding because “they’re just done with the whole sneaking around phase.” The outlet further clarified that the two “still don’t want to have a public relationship, but it was a lot of effort to keep things under wraps and never be able to go out together.” Cruise’s nonexistent romance with Moss wasn’t a factor. This latest article is more nonsense from the untrustworthy outlet. That didn’t happen either. The actress has a boyfriend who’s identity she’s keeping private, but it’s not Cruise. E! Last week, Holmes and Foxx arrived together at the Met Gala and posed for photos inside the event after years of hiding their romance. Gossip Cop can debunk it. The two stars simply aren’t a couple. for falsely claiming Cruise is in a secret romance with Moss, who’s a fellow Scientologist. Elisabeth Moss Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! “There are whispers that this means Katie and Jamie can finally get married, without any hassle from Tom,” contends the questionable source. “But now that he’s got other things on his mind – like Elisabeth – he’s much more relaxed.” The seemingly phony tipster goes on to say that Cruise may have even given his blessing to Holmes and Foxx. A rep for the “Handmaid’s Tale” star told us on the record that she’s not in a relationship with Cruise. In fact, Moss said in a recent Marie Claire interview that her boyfriend frequently accompanies her to Toronto Raptors and Maple Leafs games. “Tom Cruise, Elisabeth Moss Dating?” Gossip Cop, 15 May 2019. That never happened. Earlier this week, Gossip Cop busted OK!

Katie Holmes “Dumped” By Jamie Foxx At The Altar?

On the contrary, in the intervening months, the couple has become more open about their relationship. For starters, Foxx and Holmes were not slated to get married in a summer wedding, as alleged by the publication around that time. “Jamie Foxx Left Katie Holmes At The Altar?” Gossip Cop, 15 May 2018. Additionally, as we pointed out then, while the movie star has a good relationship with Grannis, he didn’t rekindle with his ex-girlfriend. That’s why Gossip Cop looks back at articles from the year before and reminds readers which outlets they can and cannot trust for reliable information. (Getting Images)
Was Katie Holmes “dumped” by Jamie Foxx at the altar? In just the first few months of 2019 alone, the very same outlet insisted Holmes and Foxx are getting married after he won over her parents. Basically, the entire tale was a lie a year ago, and none of what the tabloid stated has come to reality since then. Allison Garman, spokesperson for Jamie Foxx. It appears the publication thinks it can tell lies, and simply move on. 2019. As a result, noted the outlet, it was “over” for the actress and Foxx, leaving Holmes in “shock.”

Now 365 days later, there’s no question that article didn’t age well at all. Conversely, spokespeople for Foxx and Holmes have repeatedly gone on the record to debunk the publication’s articles, and they have been 100 percent correct every time. Astoundingly, since that false report, the tabloid has done a complete about-face. At the time, Gossip Cop said it was untrue, and with the passage of 12 months, it’s abundantly clear the report was wrong. The publication even wrongly contended the two are “unofficially engaged.” That was followed by a bogus story about how Foxx was making Holmes undergo plastic surgery before getting married. It’s our hope that these magazines will think twice before fabricating futures stories about Holmes and Foxx, knowing how Gossip Cop will hold them accountable hours, days, months, and even a year later for manufacturing untrue tales. Leslie Sloane, spokesperson for Katie Holmes. But Holmes’ rep assured Gossip Cop the narrative of her getting work from top to bottom for a (nonexistent) wedding was ridiculous. Obviously she wasn’t “dumped,” nor did she look “devastated” or any of the other synonyms the magazine used. “Jamie Foxx Insisting Katie Holmes Get Plastic Surgery Before They Get Married?” Gossip Cop, 16 Jan. And, of course, Foxx didn’t leave Holmes at the altar. That’s what one of the celebrity magazines claimed a year ago today. Shuster, Andrew. 2019. It bears mentioning the magazine has based its wholly inaccurate stories on unnamed, untraceable and possibly fictitious sources. Shuster, Andrew. Just a little more than a week ago, Holmes and Foxx posed together inside the Met gala. Not surprisingly, the Globe never issued a retraction for its phony report, nor has it explained how its articles often contradict themselves. On May 15, 2018, the Globe maintained Holmes was “dumped” at the altar by Foxx, leaving her “shattered,” “in shock,” and “devastated.” The supermarket tabloid asserted Holmes was certain she and the Oscar-winning actor were going to get married, but she felt “betrayed” after he got involved again with Kristin Grannis, the mother of his daughter Annalise. Nor was Holmes “dumped” by Foxx, with whom she’s still involved. “Katie Holmes Marrying Jamie Foxx After He Won Over Her Parents?” Gossip Cop, 5 Jan. In fact, Foxx’s rep exclusively shared with Gossip Cop that he had no plans whatsoever to tie the knot. Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes The Globe

Sources

“Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes Getting Married In Summer Wedding?” Gossip Cop, 8 May 2018.

Katie Holmes ‘Finally Agreed’ To Marry Jamie Foxx?

From there, the outlet’s so-called “source” claimed Suri Cruise was “over the moon” about her mom’s upcoming nuptials and being tapped as the maid of honor. Once she felt comfortable, reported the magazine, the two decided to plan a “small” wedding. 2018. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Never Got Married, Despite Report A Year Ago.” Gossip Cop, 19 Apr. In the real world, however, they did not get married in Paris, a point both Foxx and Holmes’ spokespersons confirmed to Gossip Cop. Allison Garman, spokesperson for Jamie Foxx, 9 May 2018. Shuster, Andrew. “Katie Holmes Having Breakdown Over Jamie Foxx Romance And Suri Wanting To Reunite With Tom Cruise?” Gossip Cop, 28 Dec. Magazine

Sources

“Jamie Foxx Convinced Katie Holmes To Get Married?” Gossip Cop, 9 May 2018. Talarico, Brittany. Clearly, OK! And while the supposed nuptials they were preparing in May 2018 was going to cost “not more than $250,000,” the alleged wedding in France cost them “$230,00 in champagne” alone, before the “fireworks over the Eiffel Tower” and all the other phony details. “Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes Make It Met Gala Official, Posing at First Major Event as a Couple.” People, 6 May 2019. It’s our belief that the more informed our visitors are, the better they’ll be able to also separate fact from fiction in celebrity reporting. The reason we occasionally look back at a cover story from the year before is to show how its claims have aged. Gossip Cop was told at the time the report was inaccurate, and now 12 months later it’s clear they still haven’t had an “intimate” wedding. Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! maintained Holmes had “finally agreed to say ‘I do’” to Foxx. has been less than okay with its tales about Holmes and Foxx, who have not planned a marriage ceremony, wed abroad, or broken up, despite the magazine’s varying accounts. (Getty Images)
Has Katie Holmes “finally agreed” to marry Jamie Foxx? And, of course, as Gossip Cop rightly reported 365 days ago, Foxx and Holmes were not getting married, and there was never a wedding in the works. The tabloid alleged back then it had learned from an insider that the actress was initially “reluctant” to marry Foxx, but the Oscar-winner had “done everything” he could to reassure Holmes he was ready to walk down the aisle with her. “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes ‘Split’ Cover Is Late And Wrong.” Gossip Cop, 3 July 2018. As we also pointed out last year, the tabloid intentionally left out of its article how more than two years ago in April 2017 it similarly claimed incorrectly that Foxx and Holmes were planning a wedding. 2018. That was the premise behind a breathless cover story exactly one year ago today. The purported tipster also shared how Holmes had already picked out a designer gown, the cake, and even the wedding’s decorative theme, all for “not more than $250,000.” Glaringly omitted in the made-up story was where and when the ceremony was to take place. Even more confusing was how earlier this year, the very same tabloid asserted Holmes and Foxx had secretly gotten married in Paris. On May 9, 2018, OK! “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Secretly Married In Paris?” Gossip Cop, 9 Jan. Curiously, a couple of months later in a report about Holmes breaking down over her romance with Foxx and Suri wanting to reunite with Tom Cruise, a supposed insider was quoted as telling the outlet, “all [Holmes] wants is to get married.” That contradicted its previous narrative about how Holmes reluctantly “agreed” to wed Foxx. Admittedly, the two have become more open about their romance, even recently attending the Met Gala together, but they’re still not going to wed. Shuster, Andrew. 2019. Shuster, Andrew. While the publication’s tales have been based on anonymous and possibly fabricated sources, Foxx’s rep went on the record with Gossip Cop to say the actor is “not getting married.”
It bears mentioning how two months after that untrue cover story about them tying the knot, the magazine printed another front page article that Gossip Cop busted which falsely contended Foxx and Holmes had split up. Gossip Cop wants its readers to remember these inaccuracies when trying to gauge future articles from that publication.

Katie Holmes Spent $200,000 On Daughter Suri Cruise’s 13th Birthday Trip To Paris?

This latest article involving Suri’s 13th birthday is more fiction. The tabloid’s story is based on claims from an anonymous and seemingly imaginary “source,” but Gossip Cop checked in with Holmes’ spokesperson, who tells us on the record that it’s untrue. That false report came on the heels of the mother and daughter visiting Syrian refugees in Greece. The alleged source goes on to say that Holmes typically tries to teach Suri “not to take things for granted,” but she made an exception for her daughter’s 13th birthday. Katie Holmes Suri Cruise Woman’s Day

Sources

“Katie Holmes Adopting Brother For Suri Cruise?” Gossip Cop, 1 Apr. Gossip Cop can correct the story. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. If it wasn’t already clear that Woman’s Day makes up stories about the actress, Gossip Cop can also point to a 2018 article claiming Holmes was pregnant with Jamie Foxx’s baby. 29 Apr. 2019. And Katie made that clear,” adds the suspicious tipster. 2019. Earlier this month, Gossip Cop busted the tabloid for falsely claiming Holmes was adopting a brother for Suri. It was in fact a special weekend for Holmes and her daughter, it just didn’t cost $200,000. In addition to the magazine’s reports being bogus, they’re also inconsistent. Holmes’ rep, who’s qualified to speak on her behalf, tells us the magazine’s price tag is “nuts.”
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time Woman’s Day has come up with a bogus story surrounding one of the actress’s trips with her daughter. That clearly wasn’t the case. Although the actress certainly treated her daughter to a lavish trip, she didn’t spend nearly a quarter of a million dollars on it. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes did not spend $200,000 when she brought her daughter Suri Cruise to Paris for her 13th birthday, despite a false report. “Where’s Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx’s Baby From 9 Months Ago?” Gossip Cop, 24 Feb. The outlet claims the actress splashed out $200,000 on first-class flights, five-star hotels and fancy meals for the group. According to Woman’s Day Australia, Holmes spent an inordinate amount of money on the getaway. 2019. “Katie Holmes ‘Single’ And ‘Broke,’ Moving Back In With Parents?” Gossip Cop, 31 Mar. The actress, however, never adopted any of the children they met there. “This was a special weekend. It’s not accurate. “It was every teenage girl’s dream come true,” a supposed insider tells the magazine. 2019. It should also be mentioned, Gossip Cop called out the publication last month for wrongly alleging that Holmes was “broke” and “moving back in with her parents.” That story wasn’t true, and this latest article makes no mention of the actress’s supposed financial issues. Instead, the outlet now contends she spent $200,000 over one weekend. Last week, the actress flew Suri and two of her friends to Paris to celebrate the young girl’s 13th birthday.

Tom Cruise ‘Shocked’ Jamie Foxx And Katie Holmes Are Still Together?

It also bears mentioning, the blog’s premise is not original either. Foxx and Holmes were never engaged. It also claims he’s looking “forward to repairing” his relationship with her. 2016. Gossip Cop is not remotely surprised by the falsity of HollywoodLies’ article because that site has been repeatedly caught publishing made-up stories about Foxx, Holmes and Cruise. (Getty Images)
Is Tom Cruise “shocked” that Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes are still together? “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT Expecting A Baby, Despite Late And Wrong Report.” Gossip Cop, 12 Feb. The Oscar-winner is not a “father figure” to Suri, who he’s rarely seen. Clearly, that was a lie, too. At the time, a Cruise insider confirmed to Gossip Cop the report was “not true.” Nothing has changed since then. “Tom Cruise Feels ‘Betrayed’ By Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes Made-Up.” Gossip Cop, 8 Sept. 2018. Nicol, Holly. “Jamie Foxx NOT Engaged To Katie Holmes, Despite Report (EXCLUSIVE).” Gossip Cop, 4 Mar. Shuster, Andrew. Further proof the outlet truly doesn’t have insight into those stars is that a year ago, HollywoodLies insisted Holmes and Foxx were having a baby and starting a family. And to make its report sound legitimate, the aptly nicknamed HollywoodLies trots out a so-called “source” who claims Cruise is “shocked” Foxx and Holmes are “happy” with one another. But the truth is Cruise has no contact whatsoever with Suri because she and Holmes are no longer members of the Church of Scientology. They never had a baby. 2017. 2018. However, an often discredited blog has once again manufactured an article that alleges Cruise is now bent out of shape about Foxx being with his ex-wife. For instance, three years ago we busted the same outlet when it untruthfully contended Foxx and Holmes were engaged. And Cruise, who has his own life, is not “shocked” seven years after he and Holmes divorced that his ex-wife and Foxx are still together because their relationship does not affect him. Shuster, Andrew. The bottom line is HollywoodLife makes up stories about Foxx, Holmes, and Cruise, and it can’t keep track of its fibs. The Mission: Impossible star moved on from his marriage to Holmes a long time ago, and whether she from time-to-time sees his Collateral co-star Foxx is of little concern. The short answer is he doesn’t care. According to HollywoodLife, Cruise, who’s been divorced from Holmes for nearly seven years, suddenly feels “betrayed” by her having a casual romance with Foxx. HollywoodLife Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes Tom Cruise

Sources

Spero, Jesse. The outlet then tips off it doesn’t really have an insider because that unnamed individual is quoted as further saying Cruise is surprised Holmes and Foxx “seem to still be together.” A real “source” would know one way or the other if they’re still a couple and not hedge with a word like “seem.”

Towards the end of its fabricated report, HollywoodLies maintains that Cruise was going to call his daughter Suri on her 13th birthday, which was last Thursday. “Jamie Foxx NOT ‘Father Figure’ To Katie Holmes’ Daughter Suri, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 1 Feb. Obviously, that was wrong. It posted a story two years ago that similarly asserted inaccurately how Cruise felt “betrayed” by Foxx and Holmes, and that he was supposedly “shocked” his friend was now dating his ex. Interestingly, in another made-up article it posted about Foxx being like a “father figure” to Holmes’ daughter, that same site noted Cruise has nothing to do with Suri because of Scientology, and yet in its new tall tale, the blog says he was calling her on her birthday and wanted to rebuild his relationship with her.

Katie Holmes ‘Single’ And ‘Broke,’ Moving Back In With Parents?

Now allow Gossip Cop to examine this wrong report. “Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise Have ‘Wonderful’ Time with ‘Beautiful Souls’ at Refugee Camp in Greece.” People, 24 Mar. And it’s interesting how the publication now says the actress is “broke,” but fewer than six months ago, it swore up and down Holmes and Foxx were buying a $56 million penthouse in New York. Lastly, as noted above, Holmes has shot a number of movies in the past year, and is far from “broke.”
Basically, everything the outlet claims is provably wrong. DeSantis, Rachel. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Adopting Daughter From New Orleans?” Gossip Cop, 11 Dec. Having established that Holmes is neither “single” nor “heartbroken” because of Foxx, let’s look at the narrative about the actress “moving back in” with her mom and dad. “Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Spotted Together in NYC Following Breakup Rumors.” ET, 28 Mar. However, Gossip Cop is not entirely surprised, considering how off-base several of its previous articles have been. The tabloid tries to bolster its premise about Holmes having “packed her bags” and “turned to her parents for support” by using a photo of her with a suitcase, but the picture of the actress leaving her home with luggage was from when she and Suri traveled earlier this month to visit Syrian refugees living in Greece. But it wasn’t true. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Moving Into $56 Million New York City Penthouse?” Gossip Cop, 8 Oct. That’s the premise behind a magazine article that also falsely alleges the actress’ “relationship with Jamie Foxx is over,” and she’s now “single.” Gossip Cop can correct this inaccurate story. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes

Sources

Katie Holmes’ IMDb page. In fact, they were photographed last week taking a walk together in Central Park. (Getty Images)
Is Katie Holmes “broke” and “moving back in with her parents”? 2018. While none of the tabloid’s claims check out, and it’s been an unreliable source of information about Holmes and Foxx in the past, Gossip Cop still reached out to the actress’ rep who confirms the magazine’s latest tale is untrue. Using a photo of Holmes dragging a piece of luggage, Woman’s Day maintains Holmes is “heartbroken” and “moving back in with her parents.” The tabloid notes how the actress “recently wrapped up filming her latest movie The Boy 2 in Canada and returned to the U.S., but instead of seeing Jamie, she immediately went back to her apartment and packed her bags.” A so-called “insider” is quoted as saying, “Katie thought she’d found the perfect person when Jamie came into her life, but when Jamie declared he was single, it proved that they’re on different pages.”

The clueless or possibly even made-up source adds, “It’s no surprise Katie’s turned to her family for support.” Then, at the end of its error-filled story, the magazine randomly asserts with no proof that Holmes is having a tough time landing good roles, and she now “has to watch her wallet, too.” But the truth is the actress has been working steadily, and while the single mom films around her daughter Suri’s schedule, she still has completed in the past year or so the TV-movie “No Apologies” and the movies The Boy 2, The Secret, and Coda. Shuster, Andrew. Obviously, they didn’t have a child together, nor did Holmes and Foxx adopt a daughter from New Orleans, as Woman’s Day also contended. 2019. “Where’s Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx’s Baby From 9 Months Ago?” Gossip Cop, 24 Feb. Shuster, Andrew. For instance, we busted a piece that insisted 10 months ago that Holmes was having Foxx’s baby. Leslie Sloane, spokesperson for Katie Holmes, 26 Mar. 2018. It was actually claimed by a blog known for manufacturing phony stories, and then regurgitated by a slew of other sites that didn’t bother to fact-check it. 2019. Also, it was never proven Foxx said he was “single” at an Oscars party. Bueno, Antoinette. 2019. 2019. For starters, Holmes and Foxx are still involved.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Secretly Married In Paris?

It’s worth noting, OK! It should be mentioned, Gossip Cop busted the tabloid’s sister publication, the National Enquirer, when it falsely claimed last November that Holmes and Foxx planned to get married in Paris. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx ‘Wedding Album’ Is Tabloid Cover Bait And Switch.” Gossip Cop, 19 Apr. Last month, Holmes and Foxx celebrated the actress’s 40th birthday by going to dinner in New York City with her mom, Kathleen. In addition to all of these stories being untrue, they’re also inconsistent. “However, they did drop around $230,000 in champagne, and treated their guests to fireworks over the Eiffel Tower.” The seemingly phony source goes on to say that the couple’s respective daughters all played roles in the ceremony. 2018. In fact, Holmes was photographed several times in New York during the week between Christmas and New Year’s. “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes ‘Split’ Cover Is Late And Wrong.” Gossip Cop, 3 Jul. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! The couple jetted off to Paris a few days later, according to the outlet’s supposed source, and “pulled off the wedding of their dreams under a veil of secrecy.” The unreliable tabloid says the pair wed at the Ritz Paris hotel in front of a small group of friends and family, including Holmes’ daughter Suri, and Foxx’s girls, Corinne and Annalise. 2017. A few months before that, we called out the magazine for wrongly reporting that Holmes and Foxx were having a baby. Weiss, Shari. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT Getting Married In Paris, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 28 Nov. (OK Magazine)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx did not secretly get married in Paris, despite a completely untrue tabloid report. It’s worth noting, neither star was spotted in Paris at any point between Holmes’ birthday in New York on December 18 and their Miami trip 10 days later. 2018. In addition to the tabloid’s story being illogical, it’s also based on claims from an anonymous and untraceable “source.” Gossip Cop, however, checked in with Holmes’ spokesperson, who tells us on the record that it’s untrue. And back in 2017, the untrustworthy outlet maintained that Holmes and Foxx were planning a wedding in the Hamptons. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Ready For Baby?” Gossip Cop, 4 Apr. 2019. Last July, Gossip Cop busted the tabloid for falsely claiming that Holmes and Foxx had split. “Katie and Jamie kept this very small and private… and made sure no one was photographed,” adds the questionable tipster. is now trying to make it seem as if the wedding came to fruition. Unfortunately, OK! When the story first emerged, the actor’s spokesperson flat-out told us he’s “not getting married,” while the actress’s rep confirmed the article was made-up. Shuster, Andrew. Holmes and Foxx spent the last weekend of 2018 vacationing in Miami, but according to the magazine, the getaway was actually the couple’s secret honeymoon. 9 Jan. This ongoing saga about the couple’s relationship is baseless. The couple simply hasn’t tied the knot. Weiss, Shari. 2018. It hasn’t. Despite what the magazine’s so-called “insider” claims, a rep qualified to speak on the actress’s behalf assures us she didn’t secretly wed Foxx in Paris. 2018. Magazine

Sources

“Katie Holmes can’t keep her eyes off her phone while looking chic out and about in NYC.” The Daily Mail, 26 Dec. has proven to have very little insight into the couple’s relationship. According to OK!, the reason the actress invited her mom to dinner was to make the announcement that she and Foxx were getting married. Gossip Cop can debunk the story. An alleged insider says the actor asked Kathleen for permission to marry her daughter, and she gave them the go-ahead. Shuster, Andrew.

Katie Holmes Marrying Jamie Foxx After He Won Over Her Parents?

Nothing has changed in the short time since. This latest article involving the actress’s parents is more fiction. Gossip Cop looked into the situation, and we’ve learned the truth. As we’ve also noted many times, the actor and the actress aren’t engaged and have no plans to get hitched. That magazine said Holmes’ parents had given Foxx their blessing to marry their daughter. 2018. Considering the outlet got a key detail of its story wrong, it’s clear the entire article is fabricated. “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes Getting Married In Summer Wedding?” Gossip Cop, 8 May 2018. Holmes brought her mom to her birthday dinner with Foxx last month, but the actress’s dad didn’t attend. The magazine’s bogus story is predicated on the idea that both of the actress’s parents were at her birthday dinner, which isn’t the case. A source close to the actress told Gossip Cop there was no truth to the premise, and the same goes for this latest take on the subject. “Jamie Foxx NOT Forcing Katie Holmes To Sign Prenup, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 26 Sep. Last May, the magazine claimed Foxx and Holmes were planning a summer wedding. “Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Celebrate Her 40th Birthday with Dinner in New York City.” People, 18 Dec. That’s the claim in one of the tabloids. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes The Globe

Sources

Fernandez, Alexia. According to the Globe, the couple has been “unofficially engaged” for a while now, but Holmes is now determined to walk down the aisle because Foxx made a good impression with her parents during her birthday dinner in New York City last month. (Getty Images)
Is Katie Holmes planning to marry Jamie Foxx now that the actor has won over her parents? “Katie Holmes’ Parents Gave Jamie Foxx Their Blessing To Marry Her?” Gossip Cop, 2 Jan. Neither premise was true, but it shows the publication has trouble keeping track of its phony stories. “Jamie was nervous about meeting Katie’s parents, Martin and Kathleen, who’ve long been suspicious about his motives,” an alleged insider tells the magazine. Weiss, Shari. At the time the story was published, a rep for the actress assured us there was “no truth” to the marriage rumors. 2019. Shuster, Andrew. Weiss, Shari. The Globe claimed a few months ago that Foxx was forcing Holmes to sign a prenup before they got married. It’s worth mentioning, the Globe also has a habit of publishing contradictory reports about the famous couple. “Jamie Foxx Left Katie Holmes At The Altar?” Gossip Cop, 15 May 2018. Just one week later, the unreliable outlet said Foxx had “dumped” Holmes. “But he’s assured them he has nothing but love for Katie and he’ll honor that once they’re man and wife.”

The tabloid’s story is inaccurate from the very start. 2018. The tabloid’s untrue story is very similar to one that popped up last week in its sister outlet, the National Enquirer. Still, the supposed source goes on to say that Holmes is “so relieved” her parents like Foxx, as now she feels better than ever about tying the knot with the actor.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Meeting With Tom Cruise Before Announcing Engagement?

It’s worth noting, RadarOnline seems to have a bad memory. “Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes Met To Discuss Her Romance With Jamie Foxx?” Gossip Cop, 14 Sep. This past July, the outlet wrongly reported that Holmes and Foxx had split. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline Tom Cruise

Sources

Siegler, Mara. 31 Dec. Holmes’ rep had told the New York Post, “Katie’s not engaged to anyone besides her fictional movie fiancé, played by Jerry O’Connell.” The actress’s rep confirms that nothing has changed in the time since. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT ‘Bitter Exes,’ Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 4 Jul. Shuster, Andrew. 2018. 2018. Only, she was wearing the jewelry on the set of her upcoming movie The Secret. According to RadarOnline, Holmes and Foxx are planning to walk down the aisle, but want to meet with the actress’s ex-husband before the wedding. Lewittes, Michael. 2018. An alleged insider tells the blog, “This has been the elephant in the room for so long, and they figure it’s time to finally address it head-on.” The supposed source goes on to say that the couple wants to tell Cruise “how they fell in love” and assure him they didn’t get together while he and Holmes were married. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. “It’s incredibly delicate and sure to be tense, but Tom seems open to making it happen and he’s mellowed a lot about the Katie and Jamie situation,” adds the seemingly nonexistent tipster. In the blog’s imaginary world, Holmes and Cruise already met up, and she’s no longer dating Foxx. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are not planning to sit down and “clear the air” with Tom Cruise before announcing their supposed engagement, despite a made-up report. This latest article makes no mention of last year’s imaginary sit-down or a summer breakup. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk the story. Despite what the website’s anonymous “insider” claims, Gossip Cop reached out to Holmes’ spokesperson, who tells us on the record that the story is “fake.” The blog relies on information from untraceable sources, but a rep qualified to speak on the actress’s behalf confirms that she and Foxx aren’t meeting with Cruise. We’ve learned it’s a complete fabrication. 2018. Gossip Cop busted the site last year for making up a story about Holmes and Cruise meeting to discuss her romance with Foxx. Holmes’ spokesperson further notes that she’s not engaged to Foxx. Another topic of discussion, according to the tipster, is Holmes and Cruise’s 12-year-old daughter Suri, who’s been estranged from her father for several years. “Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx aren’t engaged.” New York Post, 31 Oct. The reason the website has trouble keeping track of its articles about the situation is because they’re entirely made-up. This bogus rumor first emerged back in November when the actress was spotted wearing a ring on her finger in New Orleans. “Jamie will be living with her and being a full-time stepdad,” says the questionable insider, who further contends that Foxx plans to adopt the young girl once he and Holmes tie the knot.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT Planning Wedding And Having Twins, Despite Report

It’s true the actress was spotted wearing a diamond ring on her finger in New Orleans, but it was on the set of her upcoming movie The Secret. The questionable tipster adds, “It’s private and perfect for the ceremony and reception.”
Holmes’ daughter Suri will be her “maid of honor,” and the actress will “wear something classic by one of her favorite designers,” according to the suspicious source, who further contends that the guest list will include dozens of A-list stars. 2018. (In Touch)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are not planning a wedding and having twins together, despite a completely fabricated tabloid report. Despite what the magazine’s anonymous and untraceable “insider” claims, a rep qualified to speak on Holmes’ behalf confirms that she’s not engaged to Foxx and certainly isn’t planning a wedding with him. The tabloid even admits in its article that the actress isn’t expecting a child, despite what’s teased on the cover. After the wedding, “the next step would be starting a family together,” says the seemingly nonexistent insider. Katie teared up and said yes!”

The tabloid’s story is false from the very start. Holmes’ rep told the New York Post last week, “Katie’s not engaged to anyone besides her fictional movie fiancé, played by Jerry O’Connell.”
Still, the magazine continues its phony story by claiming that prior to Foxx proposing, he asked for permission from Tom Cruise, Holmes’ ex-husband and the father of her 12-year-old daughter Suri. In Touch’s report is both misleading and a work of fiction. “They want to get married at Jamie’s $25 million, 40-acre estate in Hidden Valley, California,” writes the unreliable outlet. The actress was spotted in New Orleans last month wearing a diamond ring on her finger, prompting In Touch to announce that she and Foxx are “engaged.” An alleged insider tells the magazine that after years of quietly dating the actor, “Katie finally said yes” to his proposal. “But this time was different. “Katie and Jamie are going to be husband and wife, and she trusts this is the right decision,” concludes the seemingly made-up source. Meanwhile, the “twins” scenario is completely out of left field. Gossip Cop can debunk the bogus story. 2018. There’s simply no truth to it. Unfortunately, that didn’t stop the magazine from declaring “Twins!” on its cover. Celebrity Rumors In Touch Magazine Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes

Sources

Siegler, Mara. 7 Nov. From there, the magazine comes up with all the details of the couple’s imaginary wedding. The publication then throws in one line about the possibility of the couple having twins, but acknowledges that Holmes isn’t actually pregnant. “Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx aren’t engaged.” New York Post, 31 Oct. He totally surprised her… He got on bended knee and took out the vintage ring. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. “Jamie and Katie have talked about getting married many times before, but she was always hesitant, saying she wasn’t ready,” adds the supposed source.

Katie Holmes Chose Wedding Dress, Venue For Jamie Foxx Wedding?

The outlet’s story gets flimsier from there. 2018. 11 Sep. “Katie Holmes NOT Scouting Wedding Venue In Ireland, Despite Speculation.” Gossip Cop. Falcone, Dana Rose. “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes ‘Split’ Cover Is Late And Wrong.” Gossip Cop. It’s clear neither tabloid has any insight into the pair’s romance. 9 Jul. 2018. Magazine

Sources

Shuster, Andrew. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk the claim. Earlier this month, Holmes wore a white dress to the Alice and Olivia show at New York Fashion Week. Australia, however, Holmes “dreams of becoming a wife for the second time.” The magazine begins its piece by claiming the actress locked in a wedding venue in Ireland over the summer. “Have Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Met Each Other’s Kids?” People, 31 Jan. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. 3 Jul. An alleged insider goes on to say that Holmes’ 12-year-old daughter Suri “has a close relationship” with Foxx, adding, “‘Jamie is becoming more and more of a father figure to Suri and Katie’s very grateful
 for that.” The supposed source continues, “Jamie treats Suri like one of his own daughters and is always singing silly songs to her and making her laugh and smile.”
However, People reported earlier this year that while Holmes and Foxx have met each other’s kids, the actor “hasn’t spent much time” with Suri. It’s worth noting, the American version of OK! Regardless, Gossip Cop checked in with a rep qualified to speak on Holmes’ behalf, and we’re exclusively told the magazine’s article is simply “not true.” The storyline is based on claims from an anonymous and seemingly imaginary “source,” but the actress’s spokesperson is going on the record to deny it. 2018. 2018. Weiss, Shari. A spokesperson for the actress confirms she’s not getting married. “Katie Holmes cuts an elegant figure in white halterneck dress at star-studded Alice + Olivia show during NYFW.” The Daily Mail. The actress’s visit had nothing to do with planning her own ceremony. According to OK! Only, Gossip Cop already debunked this premise back in July. (Getty Images)
A report claiming Katie Holmes has chosen a wedding dress and venue for her supposed wedding to Jamie Foxx is completely untrue. Holmes was spotted visiting a historic estate in Ireland that happens to be a place where many people get married. 23 Sept. The tabloid insists the actress wore the outfit to let Foxx “know exactly what he can expect to greet him at the end of the aisle.” The publication further contends that she gave the actor “some serious bridal vibes” and will wear the same dress to her wedding. 2018. The reputable celebrity news outlet further noted that the actor and actress “have their own separate lives and they aren’t trying to join them together.” The pair enjoy spending time together when their schedules allow it, but they’re not headed down the aisle. said in July that Holmes and Foxx had “split.” That story wasn’t true either, but the international edition of the magazine is now contradicting what its sister publication claimed. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK!

5 Wrong Rumors About Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes

Instead, Suri has been spending the summer traveling with her mom. Back in February, Life & Style alleged that Cruise was furious about Holmes having a baby with Jamie Foxx. The assertion that her ex-husband forbids her from publicly supporting religions other than Scientology isn’t true either. Weaver, Hilary. Later that year, Holmes revealed on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” that she still goes Christmas caroling. 17 Aug. More than a year later, no tell-all was ever released, nor is there one in any stage of development. Not only did a Holmes insider debunk the claim, but time has shown that the young girl isn’t pursuing a career in the entertainment industry. 2018. “Tom Cruise Reportedly Hasn’t Seen Daughter Suri in ‘About Three Years.'” Us Weekly. 28 Jun. At the time the article was written, a rep for Holmes exclusively assured Gossip Cop the actress didn’t have a book in the works. “Katie Holmes’ Family Goes Telephone Caroling for Christmas.” YouTube, 7 Dec. 2016. Australia in May for falsely claiming that Cruise had banned his ex-wife from attending this year’s Met Gala. Andersson, Eric. (Getty Images)
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes divorced back in 2012, but the ex-spouses continue to be the joint subjects of bogus tabloid stories. During a 2016 appearance on “The Late Late Show with James Corden,” Holmes revealed her favorite Christmas song. 2016. The story came from an anonymous and untraceable “source,” but Holmes’ own spokesperson said on the record it was fabricated. It was said the exes had agreed to set up a meeting in London. Some of the topics that would supposedly be covered included Scientology’s role in their divorce and the reason the actor hasn’t seen his daughter in years. Mohr, Ian. Last month, Gossip Cop called out Star for wrongly reporting that Cruise and Holmes had their legal teams work out a deal for the actor to reunite with his 12-year-old daughter Suri after years of being estranged. Last December, New Idea made up a story about Cruise being in a “fury” over Holmes supposedly helping their daughter Suri break into show business. The actress clearly isn’t forbidden from discussing her faith. Gossip Cop busted OK! 2 Jul. It’s recently been reported that Holmes and Foxx’s romance is going strong, but as time has shown, they’re not having a baby. “Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes still going strong despite breakup rumors.” New York Post. Celebrity Rumors Katie Holmes Tom Cruise

Sources

The Late Late Show. Obviously, no such reunion has taken place. 2018. Only, Holmes and Foxx didn’t have a child together, so the movie star wasn’t angry about an imaginary scenario. The actor, a devoted Scientologist, was said to have prohibited Holmes from going to the event due to its Catholic theme. 2016. But Cruise hasn’t seen Suri in a number of years and doesn’t play a role in her life, so the premise didn’t make much sense. “Let It Be Known That Suri Cruise Is Having a Better Summer Than Anyone.” Vanity Fair. “Katie Holmes Has Her Childhood Christmas Tap Dance Memorized.” YouTube, 16 Dec. Here are five recent wrong rumors about the exes. And finally, Star published a ridiculous cover story in June 2017 saying that Holmes was writing a tell-all book about her marriage to Cruise. The Tonight Show. Gossip Cop has debunked several false articles about the pair as of late. A rep for Holmes, however, told us the real reason she couldn’t attend the gala was because she was out of town working.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT “Bitter Exes,” Despite Report

As Gossip Cop exclusively reported, it was all untrue. Weiss, Shari. Jamie Foxx Dumps Katie Holmes For Pressuring Him To Go Public With Romance.” RadarOnline, 24 Oct. 27 June 2018. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are not “bitter exes,” despite a new report. Of course, it’s the same blog that in April 2016 falsely swore up and down that they were getting married in Michigan, only to reverse itself in October of that year and wrongly also contend Foxx dumped Holmes. After some digging we can confirm that Page Six was right on the money on Monday when it reported that Holmes told Foxx she loves him while FaceTiming with him on her plane to Paris for Fashion Week. “Katie Holmes Declares Love for Jamie Foxx after Breakup Buzz.” Page Six, 2 July 2018. Regardless, as Gossip Cop was the first to report last week, despite the blog’s claim about a proposed “Paris wedding” and supposed breakup, there was no wedding for Holmes and Foxx to call off nor did they split. “Jamie Foxx Parties with Ladies in Malibu While Katie Holmes Tours Paris after Denying Split Rumors.” Daily Mail, 4 July 2018. Russian, Ale. Allison Garman, Spokesperson for Jamie Foxx. That’s hardly “bitter.” It’s actually quite sweet. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT ‘Call Off Wedding,” Despite ‘Split’ Report.” Gossip Cop, 27 June 2018. And now we hear that far from being “bitter,” while Foxx and Holmes see each other when they can, and keep their relationship casual, there is real “love” for one another. Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline

Sources

Katee, Annita. The Daily Mail, however, paid for the photos of Foxx with two ladies in Malibu, and noted that the Oscar-winner was simply “chatting to the women at a private event while showing them images on his phone.”
Nowhere in the British tabloid’s account was there anything to suggest that Foxx and Holmes’ relationship is now “bitter” or that they really split. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. Almost comically, the website that started this bogus premise claims, “Katie just couldn’t get over her trust issues.” But the reality is one shouldn’t necessarily trust that outlet’s reporting because Holmes and Foxx’s relationship is perfectly in tact. A rep for Foxx first exclusively told us there never ever were marriage plans, and a rep for Holmes also assured us the site’s story was “100 percent untrue.” A day later, People confirmed our reporting with an article that similarly stated talk of a Holmes-Foxx split was wrong. It almost feels as if the often disproved website just wanted to run a sensational headline to dupe its readers into clicking onto a number of unrelated photos. “with two models by his side.”

Naturally, the blog doesn’t have any details, including who the supposed “models” were or what the circumstances were. Mohr, Ian. 2016. The claim comes from the same outlet that falsely began the rumor that the two had called off their wedding and split up. And frankly, the new RadarOnline piece also offers no proof whatsoever that anything is “bitter” between the two. The latest misfire from RadarOnline is titled, “Bitter Exes? “It’s Off! 27 June 2018. “Katie Holmes’ Publicist Shoots Down Online Gossip Site Report.” People, 28 June 2018. In fact, the outlet, which boasts at the end of most of its articles, “we pay for juicy info,” didn’t shell out the money to buy the photos of Foxx with the two women. The truth and only new development Gossip Cop hears is that while they see each other when time permits, Holmes and Foxx have true feelings of “love” for each other. Katie Holmes Enjoys Paris As Jamie Foxx Parties Hard In Hollywood.” The website again incorrectly maintains the two recently “called it quits after five years of [a] secret romance,” and that they were “ready to take the next step… planning a Paris wedding and lavish honeymoon.” But after those untrue statements, the outlet really has nothing new to offer, other than to say Foxx was just seen in L.A.

Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes “Split” Cover Is Late And Wrong

This was later confirmed on Thursday by People, who similarly reported that the narrative about a Foxx-Holmes “split” and canceled wedding was untrue. 27 June 2018. Also, this same outlet was responsible for our top Holmes-Foxx rumor of 2017, after publishing a cover story that tried to trick readers into thinking they were married in a secret wedding. Gawley, Paige. Last Wednesday, RadarOnline peddled a story online that falsely claimed Holmes “called off” a wedding to Foxx after supposedly being unable to “get over her trust issues.” The actress was described as “devastated,” but the site also alleged she had already “started to move on” with a New York-based lawyer. 2017. is belatedly repeating them. Katie & Jamie Split!” The print story is almost word-for-word the same as the online version, with the tabloid unable to offer any new evidence or proof to substantiate the already debunked contentions. Russian, Ale. And on Friday, “Entertainment Tonight” further backed up what Gossip Cop has reported all along, which is that Holmes and Foxx have “independent lives,” where they see each other when they can, as opposed to being in a constant, full-on relationship. “Katie Holmes’ Publicist Shoots Down Online Gossip Site Report.” People, 28 June 2018. Holmes’ own spokesperson separately told us entire story was “100 percent untrue.”

We also learned from our sources that Holmes and Foxx were still involved “casually,” and that “nothing’s changed” between them. Multiple times the tabloid has peddled fabricated stories about Holmes being pregnant with Foxx’s baby, including last September. Lewittes, Michael. But a rep for Foxx confirmed to Gossip Cop that he and Holmes never had any marriage plans in the first place. In other words, the magazine is hoping readers shell out $5.99 for something that was already widely corrected. Last week, Gossip Cop and a few other outlets set the record straight on this topic. If she was actually expecting then, as alleged, she would’ve given birth in the spring. has published a cover wrongly announcing, “The Wedding Is Off! Allison Garman, Spokesperson for Jamie Foxx. Now the publication is again trying to dupe people. (OK Magazine)
A new tabloid cover announcing Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes have “split” is both late and wrong. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Top Rumor Of 2017: Married In Secret Wedding.” Gossip Cop, 31 Dec. But that never happened, just like she never delivered a baby any of the other times the magazine declared she was pregnant. We can now do so again. And like its sister publication, OK! 27 June 2018. Leslie Sloane, Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. Nicol, Holly. But now on Tuesday, nearly a week after our bust, RadarOnline’s sister outlet OK! 2017. That’s not how journalism is supposed to work. This misinformation was corrected by multiple outlets, in addition to their own spokespeople offering on-the-record comments. Magazine

Sources

Weiss, Shari. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT ‘Call Off Wedding,” Despite ‘Split’ Report.” Gossip Cop, 27 June 2018. But the truth is readily available and has been for days. Conclusion: Nearly a week ago, RadarOnline published a totally bogus article about Holmes and Foxx going their separate ways and canceling a wedding. The allegations are no more accurate now that OK! has proven over the years that’s it not remotely credible when it comes to these particular stars. Celebrity Rumors Fact Check Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! “Jamie Foxx, Katie Holmes NOT Expecting Baby, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 13 Sept. “Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes Have Not Broken Up, Have Always ‘Lived Very Independent Lives’ (Exclusive).” Entertainment Tonight, 29 June 2018.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT “Call Off Wedding,” Despite “Split” Report

“Why Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Are Still So Secretive.” People, 1 Feb. But RadarOnline is announcing that “the wedding is off” now that Holmes and Foxx have supposedly “call[ed] it quits.” It’s specifically alleged the actress was “in the midst of planning her dream wedding” when she had a “sudden change of a heart,” leading them to cancel “the intimate dream wedding they’d been planning.” A so-called “pal” is quoted as saying, “Katie just couldn’t get over her trust issues.”

The site alleges Holmes and Foxx originally planned to “celebrate their love with a wedding in Paris and a lavish honeymoon” at a cost of $300,000. Here’s what’s really going on: The stars haven’t been seen together since late April, and Foxx often appears like a single man when he goes out. 2017. The outlet goes on to allege that despite them being free to flaunt a romance, Foxx wouldn’t “let go” of “single behaviors,” which “rubbed Katie the wrong way,” leading her to “draw up a prenup with a no-cheating clause.”
“Jamie balked at the idea of signing,” claims the alleged tipster, who contends Holmes eventually “called up Jamie to tell him she couldn’t do this anymore.” The publication further claims she’s already “started to move on” by going on a “few dates with an NYC lawyer [sic].” Of course, she hasn’t been seen on any such outings. They aren’t focused on what’s next or what the future holds.”
Indeed, Gossip Cop has reported for years that their casual is dynamic and there is nothing serious about it. Allison Garman, Spokesperson for Jamie Foxx. It’s also doesn’t make sense that the “Dawson’s Creek” star would already be moving on to a new beau if was so “devastated” over the supposedly canceled wedding. In other words, this RadarOnline story is entirely off-base. (Gossip Cop Archives)

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline

Sources

Weiss, Shari. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx did not “call off” a wedding, despite a report claiming they have “split.” Gossip Cop can bust this misguided story, which is based on two false premises: Holmes and Foxx never had a wedding in the works in the first place, and they have never been a full-on couple. And certainly nothing as serious as walking down the aisle. That (nonexistent) agreement would’ve expired last summer, and still neither one of them have ever spoken about dating one another. A rep for Foxx confirms to Gossip Cop that he and Holmes never had any marriage plans at all. That’s because he is single and has been the whole time. 27 June 2018. “ Katie Holmes And Jamie Foxx NOT Having Wedding At Michigan Vacation House, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 21 Apr. At no point have he and Holmes been in a committed relationship. But now she’s “called the whole thing off” and is “devastated,” asserts the supposed source. As seen in the screengrab below, Gossip Cop rightly busted the blog in 2016 for falsely claiming Holmes and Foxx were getting married at her Michigan home. The website also repeats the myth that Holmes had to abide by a “5-year dating ban” from her divorce with Tom Cruise before she could confirm she and Foxx were in a relationship. Shuster, Andrew. 2018. The site has been before, too. 2016. Falcone, Dana Rose. Previously, maintains the blog, they “wanted to spend all their time together,” a laughable claim considering Holmes and Foxx have only been seen together a handful of times. In a February story about Holmes and Foxx being “secretive,” People reported, “They don’t see themselves as a couple in the traditional sense and they don’t want to be labeled as a couple.” Nothing that they have “separate lives” and “aren’t trying to join them,” it was further stressed, “There are no obligations, no requirements. That wedding never happened, just as we said it wouldn’t, and there was no wedding in the works now either. “Katie Holmes ‘5-Year Dating Ban’ After Tom Cruise Divorce Is A Myth.” Gossip Cop, 9 Sept.

Jamie Foxx “Ready To Tie The Knot” With Katie Holmes Still Fake News

Shuster, Andrew. Share The Facts

Celebrity Insider
Website

Jamie Foxx is ready to tie the knot with Katie Holmes. An alleged “insider” told the magazine the actress was initially reluctant to walk down the aisle, but changed her mind after the actor proved “he’s in it for the long haul.” However, Foxx’s spokesperson told Gossip Cop on the record that he’s “not getting married” to Holmes, nor have the two ever discussed it. We can once again set the record straight. Falcone, Dana Rose. One of the only obstacles, according to the untrustworthy outlet, is that the actress might not be ready for another high-profile marriage following the media attention surrounding her divorce from Tom Cruise. The unreliable blog claims to have spoken to an anonymous and untraceable insider who supposedly said, “It looks like Jamie is seriously considering popping the question… She’s unsure if she’ll say ‘yes,’ but we’re pretty sure she will.”
The site’s seemingly nonexistent tipster goes on to say the two will likely have a “small, private and cozy ceremony” in Paris, because it’s one of Holmes’ favorite cities. Spokesperson for Jamie Foxx. The false premise is based on an article that Gossip Cop already debunked. 2018. 2018. Last month, Gossip Cop called out the site for repeating separate In Touch and Life & Style articles claiming Foxx was upset about Holmes talking to Joshua Jackson. (Getty Images)
A story claiming Jamie Foxx is “ready to tie the knot” with Katie Holmes is both late and wrong. Obviously, these situations have never panned out, and they’re not any closer to happening. Gossip Cop has also stressed this point many times in the past. Once again, there’s no marriage or wedding on the horizon, despite Celebrity Insider arbitrarily dragging Cruise into its version of this phony story. “Jamie Foxx Convinced Katie Holmes To Get Married?” Gossip Cop. In addition to what the actor’s own rep said, People recently reported that Foxx and Holmes “aren’t focused on what’s next or what the future holds.” It’s further noted that the pair don’t consider themselves a couple “in the traditional sense,” but enjoy spending time together when their schedules allow it. “Why Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Are Still So Secretive.” PEOPLE.com, 1 Feb. 27 Apr. Friday, May 11, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/21abab66-36e0-4d15-96ba-87c74f2b1d09

Celebrity Insider Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes

Sources

Weiss, Shari. 9 May 2018. Additionally, the blog has spent years falsely claiming Foxx and Holmes were either getting married, having a baby or doing both. “Jamie Foxx ‘Does Not Like’ Katie Holmes Talking To Joshua Jackson Is Late And Wrong.” Gossip Cop. for publishing a false cover story claiming Foxx had convinced Holmes to get married. This latest recycled report is equally untrue. Earlier this week, Gossip Cop busted OK! Unfortunately, all of the evidence proving that Foxx and Holmes aren’t tying the knot hasn’t stopped Celebrity Insider from regurgitating OK!’s bogus report, while adding some new so-called “sources” of its own. Meanwhile, the blog also has a history of jumping on the bandwagon of late and wrong stories.

Katie Holmes NOT Pregnant, Despite Speculation About “Date Night Photo”

The website PopCulture, for example, is running a story on Friday with the headline, “Katie Holmes Fans Say ‘She Looks Pregnant’ in Date Night Photo With Jamie Foxx.” According to the blog, Holmes is “sparking pregnancy rumors with a new photo surfacing on social media.” The outlet notes that she and Foxx have “made it a habit of not giving away too many details on their relationship,” but claims the “latest rumor based on a recent paparazzi photo could be too huge to keep a secret.”
Referring to one paparazzi picture of Holmes that was shared online, the online publication asserts, “Fans in the comment section began to theorize that Holmes appeared to have the early signs of a baby bump, and that she was attempting to hide it with her purple and white robe.” But aside from rounding up those comments, the site did no investigating to find out whether Holmes is indeed expecting. Weiss, Shari. Rendon, Christine. Well, Gossip Cop did. To be fair, this isn’t the first time this has happened. That gave the illusion of a larger midsection than normal, leading to some talk on social media and beyond. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes is not pregnant, despite speculation. The blog put out its theory that she “could have another child on the way,” but didn’t bother to fact-check the contention. But a rep for Holmes exclusively confirms to Gossip Cop that she’s not expecting. The actress wore an oversized kimono-like coat, which she held closed across her stomach. Friday, April 27, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/609174b1-a614-455e-9afd-1758e275319f

Celebrity Rumors Katie Holmes

Sources

Miller, Mike. But she didn’t have a blossoming belly then, and she still doesn’t now, regardless of how “convinced” fans may be. On Sunday, Holmes and Foxx were photographed leaving the restaurant Nobu separately in New York City. A rep for Holmes tells us on the record that it’s “not true” she’s pregnant. It should be noted that some of the paparazzi pictures show the star with her coat open, revealing a perfectly flat stomach. Some fans have wrongly jumped to conclusions based on a recent photo of the actress on a “date night” with Jamie Foxx, and a few sites are fueling the pregnancy rumors. 2018. But apparently the website didn’t take that into account and found random social media comments reason enough to speculate. Back in December, Gossip Cop called out publications that suggested Holmes was pregnant because fans were “convinced” about a baby bump. 2017. “Katie Holmes NOT Pregnant, Despite Stories Claiming ‘Fans Convinced’ About Bump.” Gossip Cop, 15 Dec. “Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Caught Leaving Restaurant Separately After Date Night in N.Y.C.” PEOPLE.com, 24 Apr. And when Holmes stepped out for the Tribeca Film Festival this week, the Daily Mail specifically pointed out her “trim physique” and “toned torso.”
It also doesn’t make sense that Holmes would be dining at a sushi-focused restaurant if she were in fact pregnant. Share The Facts

PopCulture
Website

Katie Holmes showed she’s pregnant on a date night with Jamie Foxx. 2018. “Katie Holmes Wows as She Shows off Hint off Trim Physique at Tribeca Film Festival BVLGARI Screening.” Daily Mail Online, 26 Apr.

Jamie Foxx “Does Not Like” Katie Holmes Talking To Joshua Jackson Is Late And Wrong

Friday, April 27, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/d040cc54-fe6e-48b5-902e-d65cfb35833e

Celebrity Insider Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Joshua Jackson Katie Holmes

Sources

Weiss, Shari. “Why Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Are Still So Secretive.” PEOPLE.com, 1 Feb. Earlier this week, Gossip Cop called out both In Touch and Life & Style for falsely claiming Foxx was upset about Holmes and Jackson “talking again.” According to the unreliable magazines, concertgoers at Coachella overheard the actor “venting” his frustration about Holmes renewing a friendship with her former co-star, who she briefly dated during the early run of the late ’90s series. “Katie Holmes Did NOT ‘Dump’ Jamie Foxx For Joshua Jackson, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 18 Apr. Spokesperson for Joshua Jackson. It’s based on an entirely false premise. The actress’s spokesperson explained she isn’t in regular contact with her former co-star, who she hadn’t seen in years prior to last month’s reunion. 2018. Last week, Gossip Cop debunked the magazine’s cover story claiming Holmes had “dumped” Foxx for Jackson. “Jamie Foxx NOT “Upset” Katie Holmes, Joshua Jackson Are ‘Talking Again,’ Despite Reports.” Gossip Cop. 2018. “Inside Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx’s Latest Undercover Date.” E! Unfortunately, Celebrity Insider is now spreading this phony premise online. (Getty Images)
A new report claiming Jamie Foxx “does not like” that Katie Holmes has been “talking” to former “Dawson’s Creek” co-star Joshua Jackson is both late and wrong. 2018. Vulpo, Mike. Gossip Cop can once again debunk this bogus narrative. Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. Holmes’ rep shot down the claim, and Jackson’s spokesperson described the ridiculous report as “hilarious.” A few days after we corrected the story, Foxx and Holmes were spotted on a date night in New York City. It’s worth noting, in the wake of last month’s “Dawson’s Creek” reunion, Star also attempted to create a nonexistent love triangle between the subjects of this article. 2018. Weiss, Shari. Online, 23 Apr. The disreputable site echoes additional claims about Foxx being “hurt” and “jealous” over the situation. 25 Apr. The untrustworthy publications further contended “tension has been high” between Foxx and Holmes ever since the “Dawson’s Creek” cast reunion, where the actress supposedly rekindled her friendship with Jackson. This account of events was based on information from anonymous and seemingly nonexistent “sources,” but Holmes’ rep told Gossip Cop on the record that it was fabricated. Falcone, Dana Rose. Share The Facts

Celebrity Insider
Website

Katie Holmes is talking to “Dawson’s Creek” co-star Joshua Jackson and Jamie Foxx does not like it. Once again, Holmes’ rep already told us that she and Jackson aren’t really in touch, so the assertion that Foxx is upset about a nonexistent relationship is illogical. The site speculates that Holmes and Foxx are “on the verge of a split” and “second guessing their future” based on her supposedly reconnecting with Jackson. The blog didn’t bother to do any actual reporting, but instead regurgitates the tabloid articles that we already corrected. Regardless, Holmes and Jackson don’t have much to do with each other, so the whole story is based on lies. Additionally, reliable outlets such as People have noted that Foxx and Holmes aren’t “a couple in the traditional sense.” The two are said to have a casual relationship with “no obligations” and “no requirements,” so the actor obviously wouldn’t prevent her from having other friends.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Never Got Married, Despite Report A Year Ago

A rep for the actor told Gossip Cop last year the story was “a complete fabrication.” Time has proven that to be the case. As Gossip Cop has noted for quite some time, Foxx and Holmes enjoy each other’s company, but they’re on the same page when it comes to keeping their relationship casual. Magazine

Sources

Weiss, Shari. The outlet’s entire article, which was based on information from unnamed and untraceable “insiders,” turned out to be complete fan fiction. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx never got married, despite a false report from a year ago claiming the two were in the midst of planning a wedding. Despite it being very apparent the two never headed down the aisle, OK! “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Ready For Baby?” Gossip Cop, 4 Apr. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT Buying $30 Million Townhouse, Despite Reports.” Gossip Cop, 9 Feb. Weiss, Shari. As opposed to the tabloid’s unverifiable “sources,” reps for both stars openly shot down those tall tales. Meanwhile, Foxx and Holmes’ daughters from previous relationships would supposedly be playing roles in the ceremony. In fact, People recently reported that Foxx and Holmes “have their own separate lives and they aren’t trying to join them together.” The credible outlet also noted that the pair aren’t focused “on what the future holds,” but are content having “a good time together.” “It isn’t about anything more than that,” added the trusted magazine. Shuster, Andrew. The “wedding,” asserted the magazine, was to consist of around 50 guests, including celebrities such as Robert Downey Jr. From there, the outlet maintained that Holmes would wear a dress designed by Zac Posen, while she and Foxx planned to exchange Cartier rings. That seemed like a lot of details for a manufactured report. But as soon as this story was published 12 months ago, Foxx’s own spokesperson assured us on the record that the actor wasn’t planning a wedding with Holmes. Reps for Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes. Naturally, no ceremony ever took place in October or any of the intervening 365 days. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx ‘Wedding Album’ Is Tabloid Cover Bait And Switch.” Gossip Cop, 9 Mar. “Have Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx Met Each Other’s Kids?” PEOPLE.com, 31 Jan. Falcone, Dana Rose. 2018. Thursday, April 19, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/c52d255e-6b62-4f0d-b556-20050e327c7b

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! recently took the narrative even further by falsely claiming Holmes and Foxx were “ready for a baby.” Shortly before that falsehood, the publication wrongly reported that Foxx and Holmes were moving into a $30 million townhouse together. On April 19, 2017, OK! 2018. published a bogus article about Holmes and Foxx’s hashing out the details of their supposed wedding, which was said to be planned for that October. Share The Facts

OK! 2018. The magazine clearly has zero insight into the pair’s relationship, so it just comes up with bogus premises instead. and Eva Longoria. A clearly unreliable source told the tabloid the two were coming up with “a guest list and recruiting the bridal party,” as well as figuring out the reception, which was supposedly to be held in the Hamptons. Magazine

Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are getting married. 2018.

Katie Holmes Did NOT “Dump” Jamie Foxx For Joshua Jackson, Despite Report

Reps for both Holmes and Jackson tells us on the record that the “Dawson’s Creek” co-stars are not dating. 2012. 2018. 28 July 2017. But then they lost touch again, with Holmes’ rep even telling Gossip Cop last summer that she and Jackson hadn’t “spoken” in quite some time. 18 Apr. In fact, the only truths here are that Holmes and Jackson dated early on in their “Dawson’s Creek” days and the cast recently had a reunion for Entertainment Weekly. “Joshua Jackson: Katie Holmes Called Me to Catch Up After Tom Cruise Split.” Us Weekly, 24 Sept. As we already reported last week, that’s just not the case. Weiss, Shari. Star has published outright lies about the actress before, much like it did when it fabricated a 2016 cover story about Holmes and Foxx being married in a secret wedding. 2016. 2018. “Katie Holmes ‘Leaning On’ Joshua Jackson Is Fake News.” Gossip Cop, 28 July 2017. “’Dawson’s Creek’ Cast Reunites for Its 20th Anniversary on This Week’s EW Cover.” EW.com, 28 Mar. 18 Apr. Spokesperson for Joshua Jackson. They actually didn’t speak for a long time, until Holmes randomly called Jackson in 2012 following her divorce from Cruise. Shuster, Andrew. Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. It is simply because they came face to face at last month’s EW photo shoot that the gossip media is now trying to make it seem like Holmes and Jackson are getting back together. Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/7b62d8fe-59c0-4e4a-8d71-3bc61f3c59d8

Share The Facts

HollywoodLife
Website

Katie Holmes dumped Jamie Foxx for ex Joshua Jackson. Spokesperson for Katie Holmes. A spokesperson for Jackson even tells Gossip Cop these claims are “hilarious.” Meanwhile, Holmes’ rep insists to us that “none” of this new cover “is true.” Emphatically denying the romance claims, the rep further calls the article “made-up,” and confirms to us that the cast reunion was the first time Holmes and Jackson had seen each other in years. Weiss, Shari. Ravitz, Justin. Since then, it’s asserted Holmes has “kept him up to date on all of Suri’s momentous occasions.” And now “it’s like Jamie never existed,” claims the publication. Contrary to the contentions here, though, Holmes and Jackson haven’t had an “on-again, off-again affair” for years, and they didn’t “always” keep in touch once their show ended in 2003. “They don’t speak [regularly] either,” says the rep for Holmes. 2018. 2018. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk the report. (Star)
Katie Holmes did not “dump” Jamie Foxx for Joshua Jackson, despite a new tabloid cover story. “Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT Have Secret Wedding In Cabo, Despite Report.” Gossip Cop, 28 Dec. But much of this tale is wildly inaccurate. Share The Facts

Star
Magazine

Katie Holmes dumped Jamie Foxx to get back together with Joshua Jackson. Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/182fd2d3-bfd5-471f-bdd7-ef810ed6f4b5

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Joshua Jackson Katie Holmes Star Magazine

Sources

Stack, Tim. But the new cover of Star is falsely announcing, “Katie Dumps Jamie For Costar Joshua: It’s On!” Similarly, inside the issue, the gossip magazine contends in a teaser, “Katie Holmes has kicked Jamie Foxx to the curb for a romance 20 years in the making.” According to the story, the former colleagues have had an “on-again, off-again affair,” but after they “locked eyes” at the recent “Dawson’s Creek” cast reunion, they were “back in action.” A so-called “source” is quoted as saying, “They’ve clicked all over again, and a lot of people are rooting for them and believe the timing is right.”
As for Holmes’ relationship with Foxx, a purported “tipster close to the actress tattles” that she became “disappointed” in him and found he wasn’t “the man she thought he was” to the point where she “finally had enough of it.” And that, alleges the supposed insider, led Holmes to “go back to her ex.” And now she and Jackson are said to be “really, really happy together.”
Aside from allegedly reviving their relationship, the outlet and its “snitch” maintain Holmes and Jackson “always kept in touch,” and “Joshua was one of the first people she called when she found out she was going to have a baby” with then-husband Tom Cruise. “Katie Holmes, Joshua Jackson Getting Back Together After ‘Dawson’s Creek’ Reunion?” Gossip Cop, 11 Apr.

Jamie Foxx “Strays From Katie Holmes” With “Baby Mama” Is Fake News

This is fake news. The pictures of Foxx and Grannis, in which they are merely standing several feet apart, emerged on February 17. As for why they haven’t stepped out since then, that relates to a larger fact the website doesn’t acknowledge: Foxx and Holmes haven’t joined their lives together. According to the site’s salacious spin, the actor was “caught straying” from the “Dawson’s Creek” star, and though it’s pointed out that Foxx and Grannis are rarely seen together, a purported “pal” nevertheless contends, “It still doesn’t excuse Jamie’s behavior.” This so-called “friend” claims Holmes “will be devastated,” asserting, “No doubt she’ll demand answers from Jamie.”
The site’s supposed source further claims that “everyone has been worried about Katie” because since Holmes and Foxx were first pictured holding hands together on a Malibu beach, “Jamie has essentially vanished from her life, and now he’s been out with another woman.” The outlet also cites an alleged “spy,” who maintains, “It’ll be a miracle if Jamie and Katie can survive this.”
But there is no “this” for Holmes and Foxx to work through. (Getty Images)
A certain website wants readers to believe Jamie Foxx is “straying” from Katie Holmes. Gossip Cop can bust the story and explain what’s really going on. The dynamic between them is entirely casual and far from a serious, full-on romance. Then, Homes and Foxx were snapped by paparazzi on Valentine’s Day in February. But more than five weeks after the outing, RadarOnline is sensationally suggesting Foxx was cheating on Holmes. More than a month ago, Foxx was photographed out with Kristin Grannis, who is the mother of his youngest daughter. Between that and all the points highlighted above, it’s clear the blog isn’t credible and its easily-debunked contentions don’t really have anything to do with the here and now. Thursday, March 29, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/65475b1c-570b-44b6-892e-a30b682bbdf3

Celebrity Rumors Fake News Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline As the photos indicate, there was nothing scandalous going on. It is now March 29, and the aforementioned “friend” is talking in the present tense to claim Holmes “will be devastated” and “she’ll demand answers” about something that happened and was covered by the media more than a month ago. That makes no sense. But perhaps RadarOnline is coming from some alternate reality, one where Holmes and Foxx are married, given that this is the same outlet that claimed they were having a wedding in 2016 (see below). While the online publication has cobbled together a dramatic tale, Gossip Cop can poke number of holes showing why the story and its claims aren’t credible. (Gossip Cop Archives)

Share The Facts

RadarOnline
Website

Jamie Foxx is straying from Katie Holmes with baby mama Kristin Grannis. That means Foxx is not “straying” by having some food with the mother of his daughter, and such a claim is a fake angle attached to something that isn’t even newsworthy to begin with. They were pictured in a Los Angeles parking lot after sharing a meal. Given that they also share a child together, it’s completely reasonable for Foxx and Grannis to be in touch and to be seen with one another. It’s also just flat-out wrong to claim Foxx has “vanished” from Holmes’ life since they were photographed on the beach last September. In fact, when People reported about Holmes and Foxx’s secretive relationship last month, it was specifically noted, “They don’t see themselves as a couple… There are no obligations, no requirements.” They go about their everyday lives independently and are free to socialize with whomever they wish. As the press covered extensively in January, Foxx and Holmes were seen together at a pre-Grammys gala (see photo above).

Katie Holmes “Reigniting Friendship” With James Van Der Beek To Make Jamie Foxx “Jealous”?

RadarOnline is claiming Holmes and Foxx have “split,” and she’s “reignited her friendship” with Van Der Beek to get back at her beau. Meanwhile, a rep for the actor tells Gossip Cop that the suggestion he and Holmes have any kind of an inappropriate friendship is “totally false.” As for Holmes and Foxx’s status, there hasn’t actually been a “split.” As Gossip Cop has repeatedly reported, and reputable outlets like People have corroborated, they don’t consider themselves a couple and only see each other when their schedules allow. The site asserts Van Der Beek “shares five children” with wife Kimberly. There’s also a glaring factual error. Tuesday, March 27, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/759de45f-d87a-46d8-935c-d2a3eb7ca96c

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline That’s the rumor that surfaced on Tuesday. The online publication also tries to make hay out of Foxx “partying hard” at the Oscars while “Holmes was nowhere in sight.” Well, she was “nowhere in sight” in California that Sunday night because she was in New York preparing for a Monday appearance on “The Tonight Show.”
In fact, it was with Jimmy Fallon earlier this month that Holmes spoke about reuniting “soon” with the “Dawson’s Creek” cast. The site quotes a so-called “source,” who unnaturally and suspiciously uses Foxx’s full name to assert Holmes has “spent a lot of lonely nights without Jamie Foxx and is reading all the reports of his flirting with other women.” This questionable insider contends the actress subsequently “decided two can play at that game,” and got “back in touch with James.”
Now “sparks are flying” between the former colleagues, contends the website, with the “source” describing Van Der Beek as “thrilled.” The blog acknowledges the actor is “happily married,” but its purported tipster nevertheless alleges he has “always carried a torch for Katie… and he still feels like there could be chemistry between them.” It’s only after implying a romance could be developing that the outlet adds that Holmes and Van Der Beek are “keeping it platonic.”
The rest of the piece is filled out with claims about Holmes and Foxx having “relationship problems.” Such contentions, however, are based on tabloid stories that Gossip Cop has already debunked, about the actress supposedly being upset with him for spending time with the mother of his child. But Gossip Cop can exclusively bust the untrue story. This is the same outlet that falsely claimed Holmes and Foxx were having a wedding nearly two years ago (see below). And while Joey and Dawson’s alter egos arguably always had “chemistry” as the series’ romantic leads, it’s worth noting it was Joshua Jackson whom Holmes dated in real life while on the show, not Van Der Beek. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and James Van Der Beek are friendly, but did she “reignite” their friendship to make Jamie Foxx “jealous”? In actuality, the couple currently have four children, and, as Van Der Beek revealed last month, they are expecting their fifth. But none of those key details, which provide crucial context for Holmes and Van Der Beek talking these days, are mentioned in the story. But it figures RadarOnline doesn’t know what it’s talking about. She also recently celebrated the 20th anniversary of the show’s pilot, and tagged Van Der Beek and creator Kevin Williamson in an Instagram post showcasing a throwback photo. It’s the anniversary that has prompted Holmes’ stroll down memory lane and her in interest in reconnecting with her co-stars, not anything to do with Foxx. Of course, that isn’t acknowledged in this sloppy piece, either. (Gossip Cop Archives)

Share The Facts

RadarOnline
Website

Katie Holmes is reigniting her friendship with James Van Der Beek to make Jamie Foxx jealous. By the way, a confidante tells Gossip Cop that, in regards to this tall tale, “Radar is going to look really stupid in a few days.” We look forward to seeing what transpires.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT Split, Despite Report

We’re told it’s simply not true. says Holmes ended her relationship with Foxx over several different factors, including his refusal to go public with their romance and his commitment issues. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk the breakup rumor. The magazine clearly has very little insight into the relationship between the stars. “After his recent antics, it’s getting harder for her to see a future with him, and she needs to put herself and her child first,” says the supposed source. Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/1e51e900-c487-45cc-a16d-b191d7928d9f

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! Regardless, Holmes hasn’t dumped the actor, and the tabloid’s take on their relationship is entirely wrong. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx did not split, despite a new report falsely claiming the actress dumped the actor. A source close to the situation assures us that Holmes and Foxx are still together. Magazine Since Holmes and Foxx stay secretive about their romance, the tabloids decide to create their own narratives about the pair. Gossip Cop recently busted OK! “Katie has felt betrayed by Jamie over and over again… It’s hard for her to trust him.”
The unreliable magazine claims another reason that Holmes dumped Foxx is because she’s looking out for the best interests of her 11-year-old daughter Suri. Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/2f30c256-6343-42b5-8ab1-555ed0525078

Share The Facts

OK! Magazine

Katie Holmes dumped Jamie Foxx. The latest issue of OK! Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/a01d50a0-f54f-4e98-b4fd-2f49fee29e0b

Share The Facts

HollywoodLife
Website

Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx have split. An alleged “insider” tells the magazine that the actress believed their dynamic would change after they were photographed holding hands on the beach last year, but Foxx “still seems reluctant to show the world how much he cares about her.”
The final straw, according to the suspicious source, came last week when Foxx was spotted grabbing lunch with Kristin Grannis, the mother of his 8-year-old daughter Annalise. As we’ve also noted, the two enjoy spending time together when their schedules allow it, but they also have their own separate lives. We’re further told they’re on the same page when it comes to keeping their relationship private. We also called out the publication last year for falsely claiming that the actor and actress were getting married and having a baby. “Katie felt humiliated when she saw the photos of Jamie and his ex,” says the questionable tipster. for wrongly reporting that the two were buying a $30 million townhouse in New York City. Share The Facts

Celebrity Insider
Magazine

Katie Holmes dumped Jamie Foxx because she was sick of him keeping the relationship a secret. “She’s done a fantastic job raising her daughter, and she doesn’t need a man to be happy.”
Gossip Cop, however, has learned that this is all inaccurate.

Katie Holmes Did NOT Demand Jamie Foxx “Give Up Junk Food,” Despite Report

The movie star, who frequently plays action heroes on the big screen, isn’t gorging on junk food and getting out of shape. “She’s banned him from eating [junk food],” says the supposed source. “She worries about him,” adds the questionable tipster. Share The Facts

RadarOnline
Website

Katie Holmes is demanding that Jamie Foxx give up junk food. We’re told there’s no truth to it. Monday, February 26, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/dcca027e-045e-4031-a25f-a0a26af3473a

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes RadarOnline Oddly enough, this also isn’t the first time that Gossip Cop has had to debunk a bogus story about the pair clashing over their different lifestyles. Shortly after photos emerged of the two holding hands on the beach last year, we busted the site for falsely claiming that Foxx reached out to Tom Cruise and asked for his blessing to date his ex-wife. Following that fabrication, the blog wrongly reported that Holmes was meeting up with Cruise to “clear-the-air” about her relationship with Foxx. “After all, he’s 50!” Gossip Cop, however, has learned this entire narrative is fabricated. It’s worth noting, Gossip Cop often has to call out RadarOnline for publishing lies surrounding Foxx and Holmes’ causal relationship. This latest phony article is another example. A source close to the situation laughed off the outlet’s story before exclusively assuring us it’s “false.” It’s possible this article was concocted because Holmes and Foxx were spotted heading to the gym together on Valentine’s Day, but the implication that she forces him to stay healthy isn’t true. As the story goes, Holmes has purportedly caught the actor “hoarding cookies” and other fatty foods on occasion. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes did not demand that Jamie Foxx “give up junk food,” despite a completely made-up report. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk this nonsense. We previously busted the online outlet for wrongly alleging that Foxx wanted to give Holmes a “hip-hop makeover” because he finds her choice of clothing too “prim and proper.” Most gossip publications seem to know very little about Foxx and Holmes’ dynamic. An alleged insider tells RadarOnline that Foxx made it seem like he was “health-conscious” when the two first started dating, but the actress has come to realize “he’s a candy bar-eating closet junkie.” According to site’s “source,” Holmes is dedicated to diet and exercise, but Foxx isn’t as concerned with staying fit. Now, says the “insider,” the actress is putting her foot down.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Rocked By Cheating Claims?

Gossip Cop can bust this story. But that’s the least of the problems here. They did nothing of the sort. The gossip magazine alleges their supposed “happy ending” hasn’t come without “complications.” It’s specifically claimed that although they were photographed smiling at the aforementioned Grammy Awards party, “behind the scenes, Katie has been forced to ‘lay down the law’ with Jamie over rumors that he has cheated.”
A so-called “well-placed source” is quoted as saying, “Jamie has a reputation as a ladies’’ man and Katie has always been well aware of that and the scrutiny it causes.” This alleged tipster claims to the outlet that Holmes has been “growing concerned that his penchant for partying has been getting out of control when there are other
women around,” and asserts she’s “heard whispers from friends in the industry that his partying attracts female attention and with that inevitably come rumors.”
As an example, the publication mentions that last year a “US magazine” alleged Foxx “betrayed” Holmes with a Russian mistress, but “his rep dismissed the claim as ‘completely fabricated.’” It was to Gossip Cop whom the spokesperson gave that statement, and nowhere does Grazia give us credit for our debunking despite referencing it. They haven’t been rocked by anything, nor is Holmes dealing with “heartbreak.” This cover story is embarrassingly wrong, and the purported “well-placed source” appears to be fictional. Share The Facts

Grazia
Magazine

Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx have been rocked by cheating claims. Contrary to what the gossip media wants readers to believe, there is nothing serious about the stars’ connection. Furthermore, Gossip Cop is assured that no one genuinely close to Holmes would be talking about whatever is or isn’t going on with her and Foxx to an outlet like Grazia. And while they ended up sitting together at the Grammys party, Holmes was actually “uncomfortable” with the situation, and they never intended the event to be some sort of coming out. (Grazia)
Are Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx being rocked by cheating claims? Saturday, February 10, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/46149d0a-3439-440d-a23e-c548123ebb7e

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes That’s what the cover of a British tabloid is alleging. There are no obligations, no requirements.” So the notion that she’s “lay[ing] down the law” about alleged dalliances with other women has no basis in reality. The supposed snitch claims Holmes is now “terrified of getting hurt or, worse, publicly humiliated,” and contends she’s told Foxx that “while she doesn’t believe everything she reads, the rumors upset her.” This purported tipster further asserts, “This is no longer a casual fling and hasn’t been for some time,” and maintains Holmes would be “devastated” if the relationship “were to crumble within a matter of months of going public.” Actually, a “casual fling” is exactly what their dynamic is. Instead, the UK tabloid goes on to bring up other inaccurate rumors, such as Foxx allegedly “flirting” with Eva Longoria. Holmes and the actor have never ever posed together on a red carpet. “Katie’s Heartbreak Over Cheating Rumors,” reads the headline inside Grazia, which falsely claims she and Foxx “made things red carpet official at a pre-Grammys party” last month. To paraphrase one of the lines: Don’t believe everything you read. But it isn’t the least bit true. As People recently reported about Holmes and Foxx, “When they can be together, they are.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx NOT Buying $30 Million Townhouse, Despite Reports

While Holmes and Foxx do spend time at each other’s homes, they have no intention of buying one together. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx are not buying a $30 million townhouse, despite reports spreading in the gossip media. Gossip Cop can exclusively debunk the false stories. Foxx and Holmes are not living together. Share The Facts

OK! Friday, February 9, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/bb57c19a-5035-4cd6-9287-2fc4be14beb7

Celebrity Rumors Heat Magazine Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes OK! Friday, February 9, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/d36bbc1a-ee18-4559-bbac-bd0c5b5fc91e

Share The Facts

Woman’s Day New Zealand
Magazine

Jamie Foxx and Katie Holmes are looking for a home to move in to together. They are not getting married. And they are certainly not having a child together. There are no obligations… They still have their own separate lives and they aren’t trying to join them together.” A commitment involving a house, marriage and kids is not in their future. In a recent People article about Foxx and Holmes, the magazine reported, “When they can be together, they are. It feels like a real family home.” Despite the price discrepancy, the outlet seems to be referring to the same townhouse as Heat and OK!, and there’s a suspiciously similar quote about wanting a place with “plenty of room for a growing family.”
In fact, a number of the quotes appear to be almost word-for-word. In actuality, the pair has no plans to live together at all. The original report cites a so-called “source,” who asserts, “They’ve told their real estate agent that they are looking for somewhere with plenty of room for an expanding family.”
Meanwhile, the New Zealand edition of Woman’s Day also alleges Holmes and Foxx are looking for a “love nest,” but that publication claims it’s an “impressive $40 million property.” The supposed “insider” in that article is quoted as saying, “Katie fell in love with the place as soon as she saw it and [daughter] Suri squealed with delight. Magazine

Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx have their eyes on a $30 million townhouse. Magazine Woman’s Day, however, takes things a step further with its supposed snitch contending that in addition to living together, Holmes and Foxx are “thinking about tying the knot in June or July.” There’s even speculation about a “baby on the way.” But none of this is true. A rep for Foxx exclusively tells Gossip Cop the claims are entirely “inaccurate.” And contrary to what these tabloids want readers to believe, his relationship with the actress isn’t that serious at all. The outlet claims Holmes and Foxx have “apparently been living together since 2017.” But even though the stars allegedly have a “love pad,” according to the tabloid, they are “planning on getting a very expensive new place together.”
Picking up the same claims from the British magazine Heat, the American tabloid maintains Holmes and Foxx have been “checking out properties close to New York’s Central Park, including a stunning $30 million townhouse.” The home is said to feature six bedrooms and 11 bathrooms. story on its website. “Katie Holmes & Jamie Foxx Have Their Eyes On A Stunning $30 Million Townhouse,” reads the headline of an OK!

Tom Cruise Dragged Into Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Baby Rumors

Regardless, we’re told that Cruise, who’s been estranged from his ex-wife for the past few years, hasn’t expressed an opinion on her relationship with Foxx. “He won’t be happy for Katie, and especially not Jamie, whom he once considered a good friend.” The alleged insider goes on to say that Cruise “was livid” when he first heard about their relationship, adding, “He wants you to think he’s above these feelings, but how can he be?”
As Gossip Cop noted, Holmes and Foxx have zero plans to have a child together, so this entire article is based on a false premise. In fact, People recently reported that while the pair enjoy spending time together, they “aren’t focused on what’s next or what the future holds.” Gossip Cop can also confirm that the actor and actress don’t envision babies in their future. Although Holmes and Foxx casually date, it’s widely understood that the two have their own separate lives. Thursday, February 8, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/6c20ccf4-4287-4ec9-b0f0-64067e3af08b

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes Life & Style Tom Cruise Of course, the two aren’t planing to have child, despite Cruise now being dragged into this bogus narrative. On Wednesday, Life & Style published a phony report about Holmes and Foxx starting a family together. “Don’t think for one minute that Tom won’t be bothered if she gets pregnant by Jamie,” a so-called “source” tells the outlet. Gossip Cop can exclusively set the record straight. Unfortunately, that hasn’t stopped the unreliable magazine from further speculating about what Cruise will think of his ex-wife and Collateral co-star having a child together. However, a rep for the actor exclusively told Gossip Cop that the claim was “completely inaccurate,” while a source close to the actress echoed that sentiment. (Getty Images)
A tabloid is involving Tom Cruise in the false rumors about Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx supposedly deciding to have a baby together. Share The Facts

Life & Style
Magazine

Tom Cruise won’t be happy about Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx having a baby together. Also, the tabloid’s assertion that the movie star “won’t be happy” about Holmes getting pregnant is completely moot, considering it’s not happening.

Katie Holmes, Jamie Foxx Did NOT Decide To Have Baby Together, Despite Report

A rep for Foxx exclusively tells Gossip Cop this baby story is “completely inaccurate.”

Share The Facts

Life & Style
Magazine

Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx decided to have a baby together. She’s been telling friends that she doesn’t have time to waste.” Of course, if this snitch and the alleged “insider” were really knowledgeable, they would know for sure whether or not the actress is already expecting. As this new story goes on, it’s asserted Foxx and Holmes have prioritized having a child over tying the knot, with the “insider” alleging, “They’re both excited to have a baby.” Actually, it’s the publication that’s “excited,” since this whole narrative was manufactured. There’s just the tabloids striking out again and again and again. Then just last week, the gossip magazine flip-flopped on Foxx and Holmes combining families. Simply put, there’s no baby on the horizon and there’s no “serious” relationship. For the record, this same outlet also wrongly speculated Holmes had a baby bump in December. But the claims have never matched reality and they still don’t. And contrary to the assertions that Holmes “can’t wait to have children with Jamie” and that Foxx has “wanted to start a family with Katie for a while,” it was also noted by People, “They still have their own separate lives and they aren’t trying to join them together. (Getty Images)
Katie Holmes and Jamie Foxx have not decided to have a baby together, despite a new report from the tabloids. For example, while the tabloid claims “Katie and Jamie were thrilled to finally be out in public together” and make their debut as a “couple,” Holmes was actually “really uncomfortable” being in the spotlight with Foxx at the Grammys party. They aren’t focused on what’s next or what the future holds.” But here’s Life & Style, with its horrible track record, trying to get readers to believe otherwise. In that piece, which was copied from People, the outlet said the stars were “definitely taking their relationship slow.” But now, just days later, the publication is back to its original narrative, insisting the relationship has “gotten so serious” that they’re heading toward parenthood. Last September, Life & Style ran a false article about Foxx wanting to marry Holmes and have a baby with her. People further reported, “They don’t see themselves as a couple in the traditional sense and they don’t want to be labeled as a couple,” backing up what Gossip Cop has rightly said for years. Gossip Cop can exclusively bust the claim. Not only does this contradict a prior story, but it’s also not true in the slightest. Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Share
Read More

Embed

Information on embedding in your site
oEmbed Link
https://www.sharethefacts.co/share/7758732e-9f7f-4993-98f4-c2ae5aa8984c

Celebrity Rumors Jamie Foxx Katie Holmes Life & Style In fact, according to the tabloid, Holmes and Foxx made their “true public debut as a couple” at a pre-Grammys party and are “finally stepping out together” because they’ve “decided to have a baby.” A so-called “source” is quoted as saying, “Jamie and Katie have been talking at great length about having a child together.” A purported “insider” supposedly “confirms” that they “both want to start a family,” and maintains it’s “why they feel it’s time to go public with their love.”
And because Holmes supposedly has a “glowing complexion and [a] hint of a bump,” the magazine insists there’s “speculation she could even be expecting already.” The aforementioned “source” contends, “At 39, Katie can feel her biological clock ticking. For years the gossip media has been spreading tabloid fantasies in which the pair marry and have a baby.